I watched Michael Moore’s movie, “Sicko,” a couple of nights ago. While I knew things were bad with the health care system in the United States, I didn’t realize they had gotten utterly miserable. (Scratch that. Maybe I did know, but it’s too painful to go to that dark place.)
Health care insurers do their damndest to find ways to deny people coverage. It doesn’t matter how life-threatening the illness – if people are sick, it costs insurers profits. Really, the system has become one of “Pay us, or else, and we will give you nothing in return. Don’t let the door hit you in the ass on the way out. That won’t be covered under our pre-existing conditions clause.”
Those who sit on committees to deny people health coverage have little to no conscience. If they do have a conscience, very few of them have the courage to speak up or do something. From my way of thinking, for every person denied coverage who later dies from lack of needed treatment, the insurer should be charged with murder. It might be easier for them to blindfold their sick clients and shoot them, because, in essence, that’s what they’re doing. But, of course, they have to rob them blind first. (Blindess? Not covered. Pre-existing condition.)
And we stand for all of this.
And we fall for the line that socialized medicine is the world’s greatest evil, with its long lines, poor care and high tax rate. This primarily comes from conservatives who can’t stand the thought of sharing their money with anyone. (Sounds like the insurers, doesn’t it?) Michael Moore’s film points out the fallacy of this line of shit, showing the benefits of universal health care in Canada, England and France. He also indicates that we socialize plenty of societal functions, such as the military, libraries, and primary level education, when its in our best interests to do so.
Funny thing about the military vs. health care. The greedy and powerful are all over sending the poor to war for them, but screw the poor when it comes to health care. Either way, the end result is the same – DEAD POOR PEOPLE. (You can hear them tittering in the corner: “Good riddance to bad rubbish. They’re not like us anyway.”)
The film made me ashamed to be an American. Where do we get off treating people this way?
An about-face was to come . . . .
Last night, I attended a benefit dinner for Brad Hoheisel at the Alliance Church in Little Falls. Brad was in a motorcycle accident not long ago and needs further physical therapy. The family can’t afford to pay for the costs of treatment, so the dinner was held to raise funds for this purpose. The church was packed with people, the line for dinner at times snaking out the front doors.
It was gratifying to see such an outpouring of support from everyday people. I am no longer ashamed of America, at least as far as ordinary citizens are concerned. They care and care deeply. But I’m still mad as hell that our society and the powers that be in this country have allowed the health care system to disintegrate to the point that people are forced to host spaghetti dinners in order to pay for treatment.
It’s time to force doctors to uphold their Hippocratic Oath, which they conveniently get to ignore by allowing insurers to make treatment decisions for them based on money. It’s time to take the profit out of illness. It’s time for universal health care.
Spitting blood in the pond,
Phineas F. A. Pickerel
November 18, 2007 at 2:27 pm
It’s almost sinful that I have not seen “Sicko” yet. I enjoy Michael’s movies. After stumbling upon this posting, I am going to have to go out and rent it immediately!
-Eric Palmieri
http://www.ericpalmieri.com
November 18, 2007 at 2:39 pm
When you identify what other people are doing as something you’re doing, you’re bound to get yourself in trouble.
November 18, 2007 at 3:58 pm
Keep in mind that what we have now is pseudo government run health care. It’s the most regulated and bureaucratic industry. It’s a mess that changing the payors or deck chair isn’t going to fix.
I know people in both Canada and the U.K. and their very unhappy. Have you read the recent articles in the London papers about people doing their own dental care including pulling teeth and supergluing their crowns because there is a shortage of dentists.
The only real answer is going to come when medicine becomes more advanced and where the technology actually makes things cheaper and more available. It’s probably going to be a biotech solution or something like nanites.
When doctors become more like technicians you’ll see a big change. Maybe 20 to 50 years. Michael Moore does make a good poster child for healthy living.
November 18, 2007 at 10:02 pm
Eric – The movie is definitely worth watching in that it gets you to think. Enjoy!
Micah – You have made my point. Here is a line that sums it up from “The Prophets” by Abraham J. Heschel – “Few are guilty, all are responsible.” We are all complicit in allowing our health care system to disintegrate. Is this not a democratic republic? Do we not have voices? Do we not share in the responsibility for caring for ourselves and others? We want the magic bullet, the quick drug, but we don’t want to do the hard work of preventative medicine. We don’t demand it of our doctors. Further, we don’t revolt against the health insurance companies. What would happen if we all just said, “Forget it. I’m not paying health insurance premiums any longer.” Cut the tumor that’s bleeding us dry? It’s like the movie “Ants.” There is power in numbers, but we have forgotten it. It’s too much bother to band together and contact our representatives in Congress. Insurance companies and pharmaceutical companies and other Big Medicine businesses don’t think this is too much trouble and they get to run things pretty much the way they like.
Steven – I think that technology is part of the problem. It’s not enough that a region has access to an MRI machine. Every tiny clinic and hospital wants one, which adds to the cost of our care. Doctors have already become technicians in my estimation. They spend a mere 5 minutes with you on an office visit and want to give you the quickest palliative they can so you will go away. Having experience naturopathic medicine, which is low-tech and the doctor typically spends an hour with a patient, I believe the majority of our ailments could be solved without the high-tech solutions. The high-tech stuff could be saved for those who really need it.
As for dental care in the U.K., a shortage of dentists is not a good situation, but can be rectified with the proper incentives. In our area, we have enough dentists – they just refuse to see poor people. Period. Anyone on Medical Assistance or MinnesotaCare is out of luck in seeing a local dentist. They won’t accept these patients because the state doesn’t reimburse enough.
It was not lost on me that Michael is not the healthiest looking individual, but at least he’s giving us another point of view and is attempting to get us involved in standing up for ourselves. That’s worth a lot.
Thanks for commenting, all.
November 18, 2007 at 10:55 pm
Forget the high tech stuff medicine is as good as it will get. Hey how about going back to leeches. The technology today is just a stepping stone to the stuff that will really work. When you go to any doctor anywhere in the world, you have know idea what the quality of care is. Every doctor is different. How about the good ones that got 90% right on their medical boards. Just hope you don’t have the other 10%.
What will happen when the government takes control of health care is the same thing that’s happened to our school system. Stagnation,preservation and mediocrity for everyone. There is a reason medical research is fleeing Europe.
November 19, 2007 at 3:52 pm
It’s not my intent to jump up and down on your last nerve, Steve, but, if we ever want solutions to the health care dilemma, we’ve got to be able to have an in-depth discussion about the issue, with all viewpoints laid out on the table. That’s what a true democracy is about.
Notice that I did not deny technology a place in medicine. I merely think that it should not be used before simpler, more cost effective measures. The overuse of technology is one factor driving the high cost of health care in the U.S.
Leeches, by the way, have made a comeback in medicine. They are very useful in procedures where there is traumatized tissue that needs extra circulation. See this link and more by googling leeches and modern medicine. http://soundmedicine.iu.edu/archive/2002/mystery/leeches.html
There is no guarantee of quality medical care here in the United States, either. That 10% of ineffective doctors could just as well be at our local clinic as in some other country. You’re darn right, I don’t want to get that 10%, but that’s where personal responsibility comes into play. We have to educate ourselves about health care and be willing to get second and third opinions if we question what a doctor has told us. We also have to know when it is appropriate to seek medical care and when a condition is self-limiting. Our rush to see the doctor during viral infections has been at the root of the over-prescription of antibiotics. Now we are having trouble with antibiotic-resistant strains of bacteria, which pharmaceutical companies have been unable to cope with from a research and development standpoint.
I have to agree that our public education system isn’t holding up well under governmental control. Part of the problem, which you will hear when talking to teachers and administrators, is that there has been a loss of local control in how that system is operated. Witness No Child Left Behind, which is the bane of many a teacher’s existence.
One socialized system that works extremely well is the military. I’m talking about active-duty military, not the way our country has decided to deny coverage and benefits for our returning soldiers. If we examined this government-run institution more closely, we might be able to replicate its effectiveness in a national health care system.
You’ve mention medical research fleeing Europe. Could you give me some sources for this information?
November 19, 2007 at 9:40 pm
Just a posting you migh like:
Self-Dentistry in the UK
Socialized medicine rocks, well, sort of. And who said that socialism thwarts individual initiative?
Some English people have resorted to pulling out their own teeth because they cannot find — or cannot afford — a dentist, a major study has revealed.
Six percent of those questioned in a survey of 5,000 patients admitted they had resorted to self-treatment using pliers and glue, the UK’s Press Association reported.
England has a two-tier dental care system with some dentists offering publicly subsidized treatment through the National Health Service and others performing more expensive private work.
But more than three-quarters of those polled said they had been forced to pay for private treatment because they had been unable to find an NHS dentist. Almost a fifth said they had refused dental treatment because of the cost.
One respondent in Lancashire, northern England, claimed to have extracted 14 of their own teeth with a pair of pliers. In Liverpool, one of those collecting data for the survey interviewed three people who had pulled out their own teeth in one morning.
“I took most of my teeth out in the shed with pliers. I have one to go,” another respondent wrote.
Others said they had fixed broken crowns using glue to avoid costly dental work.
If you have ever seen the state of their teeth for many Brits, this sounds about right.
November 19, 2007 at 11:24 pm
I’ve visited relatives in England twice since 2003, dined with large groups of their English friends and had a drink with all of their neighbors at the local pub. The state of their teeth is no better and no worse than ours in the US.
In contrast I have paid for 2 family health policies through employers and found the co pays to be so obscene that the dental part of the insurance package was useless. In another instance all in network dentists within a 100 mile radius were not taking new clients. I wouldn’t imply that NHS is flawless, but it does seem if given the choice I would rather face such obstacles at not cost than pay for a service that is part of a package and worthless to me. Hell, my sister down south and her husband pull their own teeth.
I think it is also important to say that when my cousins complain about NHS its relative to what they are accustomed to. They are comparing it to their own previous system not ours. For example,while speaking with one cousin over the weekend, she complained that NHS service is falling short and that she had to wait too long see a specialist. Her wait was about 4 weeks, a timeframe she found unacceptable. The fact is that she is accustomed to seeing specialists with little delay so compared to what she is used to she finds this unacceptable. You can imagine what she said when I told her that my daughter was forced to wait nearly 7 months to be seen by as specialist in immunology.
The health care system my cousin complains about is one that I dream to have.
If the American economy can be built on defense spending then certainly that economic base can be shifted onto America investing in education and health care.
I spent my weekend on the phone with my cousins trying to figure out how to get my daughter into the NHS system in the UK while we pooled together a list of everyone we know in Canada. Shame on America that with health insurance I have to try and get my girl into the UK, Canada or Cuba so she has the hope of not spending her entire life as sick as she has spent the last 12 years. American’s medical system doesn’t care about people. Its inhumane and demoralizing. This period in American history should be looked upon as a modern day crime against humanity.
Believe me the Brit definition of shitty health care is by far nicer than the American definition of quality health care.
If the Brits had to put up with the shit we do there would be a REVOLUTION.
November 20, 2007 at 12:46 am
All we have to do is triple our taxes and everyone can have free health care. The UK is taxing like crazy and still going broke on health care. You just want a system where someone else pays for your health care. And you’re joking if you think the English have good teeth watch the BBC for a few minutes.
November 20, 2007 at 3:01 am
The economy of the UK is not the same as the US, they don’t have the massive population of the US therefore they pay a small fortune for things like gasoline. We complain about 3 dollars a gallon while they’ve been paying 8 for several years and its high cost has nothing to do with health care and everything to do with the countries negotiating power.
Your assumption about Brits teeth is a stereotype. I didn’t say they had good teeth or bad teeth, I said their teeth are no different than what we see in the US.
The Brits are simply more down to earth than Americans; they don’t buy into the whole plastic surgery cookie cutter mantra that we see in the US. Most American newscasters have porcelain veneers covering their real teeth, those working for the BBC obviously wouldn’t dream of spending what they do earn on grinding down their real teeth to have a fake set installed over the top of them just because they look flawless. So the teeth of the BBC only proves that Brits are less vain than their American counterparts.
And NHS isn’t a system where someone else pays for your health care, it’s a system where everyone contributes and everyone is included regardless. Doctors earn more when they help their patience achieve better health, not for denying them referrals so they can’t obtain needed, covered, medical care and remain ill. Your statement of “you want someone else to pay for your.” epitomizes what is wrong with America and Americans. It’s unfortunate that Americans have so much distain and contempt for fellow American’s that we can sit back and watch one another die needlessly , as long as it means that no one cuts in to my stash. I certainly don’t share your viewpoint and don’t covet my stash in exchange for another’s suffering.
Brits, Canadians, French and Cubans wouldn’t trade their health care systems for the world, even for a reduction in taxes. they’ve mastered the “we the people”, in a way American have yet to internalize and incorporate.
November 27, 2007 at 12:40 am
All we have to do is stop spending more than half of our taxes on a military that can charge a billion dollars for an airplane, but can’t seem to keep 19 guys with box cutters from killing 2000 American citizens with one. The American military is more powerful than the next 22 standing armies combined and still we funnel money into it, because of the threat of a war that is fundamentally inexpensive to fight.
I’m willing to bet, if more than a few people managed to realize that, we’d have no trouble coming up with the funds to fix education, health care, transportation and all the other butter they have progressively skimped on in their guns and butter campaigns.
And, Mr. Rosenbaum, since we seem to have resorted to making pointed statements based on our assumptions about one another, I’ll add this. You just want a world in which you are responsible only to yourself and the world is responsible only to you. And your joking if you think a few selective columns, that totally lack context, prove anything about your argument or if you think watching the BBC makes you an expert on the state of British dental care.
However, I get the funny feeling you deem yourself an expert in a lot of things, based on your Television viewing habits. Cheers.
November 27, 2007 at 1:03 am
“When you identify what other people are doing as something you’re doing, you’re bound to get yourself in trouble.”
Yeah, they always say ‘we’ in that pseudo-communist propaganda. Here’s one I just found, “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”
Damn Pinko’s.
November 27, 2007 at 9:41 am
A little bit of fuzzy math. We spend less than 500 billion on defense out of a 3 trillion dollar budget. We used to spend half in the days of John Kennedy but it’s rapidly changing as the economy has grown.